ArP A STA KT Ae THE AIA VW
ROARN FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7e1 §. COURTHOUSE POAL,. Stillr 1UUt
ARLINGTON. VA 22204-2480
SIUN
Docket No: 2
593 Oo
11 December 20]
4
This is in reference to your application for correction ef your
naval eeoEe pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the
Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of
limitations and consider your application on its merits. A
three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
18 November 2014. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furni ished ee request. Your allegations of error
and injustice were reviewe in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures " apeligeble to tl c this
Board. Documentary material considered by O ed of
your application, together with all mater: pport
ther naval record, and applicable ions,
After and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
22 March 1988. Based on the information currently contained in
your record, you received two nonjudicial punishments (NJPs) for
making a false official statement and assault. You were also
convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of assault.
Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by
reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. You waived
your rights to consult counsel, submit a statement, or have your
case heard by an administrative Gischarge board (ADB). ie case
was forwarded recommending that you be Gischarged under other
than honorable (OTH) conditions by reason of Senet. The
separation authority concurred and directed an OTH discharge by
reason of misconduct. You were arge on 14 November 1991.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and applica
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such
your record of service, desire to upgrade your discharge, and
and assertion that your post service diagnosed post-traumatic
stress disorder (PTSD) contributed to your misconduct while on
active duty. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors
were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your
Atanhbawen elvan vour two MIDe and SPCM canwicktion The Roard
Mba ye yt yess Ye — s+ aan
noted that you waived the right to an ADB, your best chance for
retention or a better characterization of service. Regarding
your assertion that you were suffering from PTSD when your
misconduct occurred, the Board noted that the severity of your
misconduct outweighed the mitigations of your post service
diagnosed PTSD. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is. regrettedNAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2593 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03038-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, 7itting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 5 December 1994 an ADB recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reaton of misconduct due to commission of a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4376 14_Redacted
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 Aprii 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all macerial submitted in support thereof, your naval record, anc applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR510 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6699 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR896 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of service, desire to upgrade your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1004 14
A. three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together: with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were so ‘discharge on 10 November 1992. : The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1004 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0896 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval recora, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. occasions, were You were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct {civil conviction). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...